The Gentry of the Bowery
Famed punk club CBGB may be on its the way out, a victim of the unlikely
new interest in gentrification of its landlord, the Bowery Residents’
Committee, a homeless group, which is planning on doubling to $40,000
the venue’s rent. All of which made for an ironic backdrop to the CBGB
313 Gallery’s new photography exhibit, “Back to the Bowery”, which
opened last week and is up through April 8. This is a nostalgic look
back on the glory days of Bowery slumming and suffering.
Young downtown scenesters and aged CBGB alumni browsed the walls
splattered with the expected collection of mid to late 70s punk
portraiture, unnumbered and untitled. The gallery operates as a bar
most nights and the narrow passage in front of the bar makes for
crowded viewing and limited display space. Would it be punk any other
way? The show, curated by Megan Day, CBGB photographer Jon Santanello
and painter Walter Steding, was made up of representative shots of
downtown New York and its most famous punks, the gentry of the Bowery if you will, some in color but mostly
in black and white, so that the intermittent pools of color pull the
eye forward through the show.
I browed past Mr. Santanello’s work, which introduced the show, and
which felt like so much other right-time right-place color and grit
concert photography. He had a tendency toward a lazy shutter, blurring
his subjects — Joey Ramone and Siousxi Sue — and saturating their faces
with warm orange stage light. The collection deepens with the
thoughtful black and whites of Billy Name, whose soft portrait of a
still beautiful Nico captures the lifeless, slack-eyed head tilt of the
lead singer in a light that almost makes you forget the bloated junkie
she soon became. Roberta Bayley’s beautiful profile of Debbie Harry
looking into an unseen mirror as she applies lipstick, more conscious
of her reflection than of the camera, eclipses Ms. Bayley’s group
shots, which look too much like dark snapshots.

My personal favorite of the old punk masters is Godlis, whose larger
than life Joey Ramone kicking over a mic stand invests the ever
slouching rock star with the photographer’s vitality. Then there’s his
portrait of Patti Smith, which unlike the more famous Mapplethorpe
shots, is soft and kind, even feminine, quite different from the
scowling creased face that made a generation of youngsters flock to the
Village to giggle while being growled at. Godlis perpetuates the punk
obsession with morbid self-affliction in “Richard Lloyd, Hospital, NYC,
1977” in which a cigarette frames the young singer and his IV in
dissipated smoke.
Godlis is followed by Walter Steding’s colorful oils, peacock feathers
in the midst of the salt and pepper photography of Ebru Yildiz, Mark
Sweeny, Fernando Carpaneda, Sharon Smith, and Anton Parish. Mr. Steding
presents the usual roster of 70’s punk stars. Andy Warhol and David
Bowie are, as they always were, for sale. It was about then when I
realized just how much of the show I’d seen before.
Mr. Wertheimer has been taking pictures for six years now but his work
looks seasoned. Of one photograph depicting children riding bicycles
around a church on a winter’s night, he told me, “I wanted to
photograph this as timeless. I just cut out the cars and there it was.”
The picture indeed looks as though it was plucked from anytime, any New
York, a quality evident in much of his work, including the two
surrounding photos, which are not from the show. A Philly native,
Wertheimer has lived in New York for 15 years,
working
as a sound engineer for the CBGB concert venue and shooting on
his own time and dime.All and all the show was a success. Many at the packed opening were struck by the reasonable prices and versatility of work. Much of the work is almost canonical, and most all of it has certainly been seen before, but rarely has it been placed together. Introducing Mr. Wertheimer along with the established photographers shows a conscious desire by the curators to continue the ideals of punk rock art, however illusive: a young, fresh, saturated life view. Title cards and price list be damned, the work was good and there is no substitute for that.
Copyright 2002-2006, New Partisan and its contributors. All rights reserved. RSS

I think Hemingway’s main fault here is that he didn’t plant a nice big series of moral signposts for people whose definition of a good book requires them. Hemingway’s genius was his refusal to do this. Steinbeck’s was his ability to do it on a huge, societal scale, without cant, a feat you are a long way from matching. Which, I presume, is why you teach.

